Friday, October 10, 2008

Same-sex marriage

Now, I am certain that marriage was originally intended to be between one man and one woman. That being the case, why is it wrong for marriage to be limited to one man and one woman? I don't see how it is discriminatory for marriage to remain as it was intended.

Apparently the Conn. Court disagrees with me. They say (as recorded by MSNBC): "Interpreting our state constitutional provisions in accordance with firmly established equal protection principles leads inevitably to the conclusion that gay persons are entitled to marry the otherwise qualified same sex partner of their choice."

If we continue to allow the courts to legislate from the bench what will happen next? The rational used to justify same-sex marriage is not far from what it would take to justify marriage for those who practice polygamy, bestiality, or any other sexual perversion.

1 comment:

Dove said...

One Man and One Woman, Marriage One way! :)